Oriana Figueroa Valdebenito

References

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 16(3), 397-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204 

Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., & Gladue, B. A. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1081-1093. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1081

Barrada, J. R., Castro, Á., Correa, A. B., & Ruiz-Gómez, P. (2018). The Tridimensional Structure of Sociosexuality: Spanish Validation of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 44(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1335665 

Bullough, V. L. (2004). Sex will never be the same: The contributions of Alfred C. Kinsey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000026627.24993.03

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992.

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 77-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408 

Butterworth, J., Pearson, S., & von Hippel, W. (2023). Dual Mating Strategies Observed in Male Clients of Female Sex Workers. Human Nature, 34(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-023-09439-1 

Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1556/jep.7.2009.1.5

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 

Dinh, T., Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2022). “Fast” women? The effects of childhood environments on women’s developmental timing, mating strategies, and reproductive outcomes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.12.001 

DiStefano, C., & Morgan, G. B. (2014). A Comparison of Diagonal Weighted Least Squares Robust Estimation Techniques for Ordinal Data. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 21(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915373 

Fajardo, G., Polo, P., Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., & Rodríguez-Sickert, C. (2022). Long-Term Mating Orientation in Men: The Role of Socioeconomic Status, Protection Skills, and Parenthood Disposition. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815819 

Figueroa, O., Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., Rodriguez-Sickert, C., Valenzuela, N., Pavez, P., Ramírez-Herrera, O., Pita, M., Diaz, D., Fernández-Martínez, A. B., & Polo, P. (2020). Testing strategic pluralism: The roles of attractiveness and competitive abilities to understand conditionality in men’s short-term reproductive strategies. PloS One, 15(8), e0237315. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237315

Fisher, M., Cox, A., Bennett, S., & Gavric, D. (2008). Components of self-perceived mate value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary & Cultural Psychology, 2(4), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099347 

Gallup, A. C., & Fink, B. (2018). Handgrip Strength as a Darwinian Fitness Indicator in Men. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(439), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00439

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X

Greitemeyer, T. (2020). Unattractive people are unaware of their (un) attractiveness. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 61(4), 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12631 

Hille, Z., Oezdemir, U. C., Beier, K. M., & Hatzler, L. (2021). The disruptive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual behavior of a German-speaking population. Sexologies, 30(1), e23–e33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2020.12.013 

Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00149-6

Jackson, J. J., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.005 

Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936-949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7 

Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 631-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9242-8 

Lim, S., & Jahng, S. (2019). Determining the number of factors using parallel analysis and its recent variants. Psychological Methods, 24(4), 452. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000230 

Lukaszewski, A. W., Larson, C. M., Gildersleeve, K. A., Roney, J. R., & Haselton, M. G. (2014). Condition-dependent calibration of men’s uncommitted mating orientation: Evidence from multiple samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.03.002 

Malkewitz, C. P., Schwall, P., Meesters, C., & Hardt, J. (2023). Estimating reliability: A comparison of Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ωt and the greatest lower bound. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100368 

Meskó, N., Láng, A., & Kocsor, F. (2014). The Hungarian Version of Sociosexual Orientation Inventory Revised (SOI-R): Sex and Age Differences. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 8(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v8i1.130 

Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2017). Mplus. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory (pp. 507-518). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315117430 

Nascimento, B. S., Hanel, P. P., Monteiro, R. P., Gouveia, V. V., & Little, A. C. (2018). Sociosexuality in Brazil: Validation of the SOI-R and its correlates with personality, self-perceived mate value, and ideal partner preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.007 

Neto, F. (2016). Psychometric Properties of a Portuguese Version of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. Journal of Relationships Research, 7, e5, Article e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2016.3 

Penke, L. (2011). Revised sociosexual orientation inventory. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 625). Taylor & Francis. 

Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond Global Sociosexual Orientations: A More Differentiated Look at Sociosexuality and Its Effects on Courtship and Romantic Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113 

Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Women’s Sexual Strategies: The Evolution of Long-Term Bonds and Extrapair Sex. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17(1), 59-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2006.10559837 

Polo, P., Muñoz‐Reyes, J. A., Pita, M., Shackelford, T. K., & Fink, B. (2019). Testosterone‐dependent facial and body traits predict men’s sociosexual attitudes and behaviors. American Journal of Human Biology, 31(3), e23235. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23235

Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 186-201. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.014 

Romero, D., Mebarak, M., Millán, A., Tovar-Castro, J. C., Martinez, M., & Rodrigues, D. L. (2023). Reliability and Validity of the Colombian Version of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(1), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02402-8 

Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(02), 247-275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000051

Schreiber, J. B. (2017). Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13(3), 634-643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.06.006 

Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870 

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Aldine-Atherton.

Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 755-782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps 

Waldis, L., Borter, N., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2021). The Interactions Among Sexual Orientation, Masculine and Feminine Gender Role Orientation, and Facets of Sociosexuality in Young Heterosexual and Homosexual Men. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(12), 2003–2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1717837 

Webster, G. D., & Bryan, A. (2007). Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: Why two factors are better than one. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 917–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.007 

Wignall, L., Portch, E., McCormack, M., Owens, R., Cascalheira, C. J., Attard-Johnson, J., & Cole, T. (2021). Changes in Sexual Desire and Behaviors among UK Young Adults During Social Lockdown Due to COVID-19. Journal of Sex Research, 58(8), 976–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1897067 

 

Contáctanos

Somos parte del Centro de Investigación en Complejidad Social (CICS) de la Facultad de Gobierno de la Universidad del Desarrollo. El CICS se ubica en Av. Las Condes 12461, edificio 3, piso 3.

Por favor, activa JavaScript en tu navegador para completar este formulario.

Llamado a una acción o destacar contenido

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis.